{"id":13636,"date":"2026-10-17T00:27:19","date_gmt":"2026-10-17T00:27:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/"},"modified":"2026-10-17T00:27:19","modified_gmt":"2026-10-17T00:27:19","slug":"grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/","title":{"rendered":"Grasping How the Gaming Sector Levies Support Problematic Gambling Recovery Initiatives"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The financing of gambling addiction treatment programs depends significantly on financial contributions generated through <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitespacegallery.co.uk\/\">gambling sites not on GamStop<\/a> imposed on operators across different regions. These mandatory fees, typically calculated as a portion of gaming earnings or as fixed licensing costs, create a designated funding source specifically allocated to prevention, education, and treatment services for individuals struggling with gambling-related harm. Understanding this funding mechanism is crucial to stakeholders, policymakers, and communities seeking to address the social costs associated with gaming operations.<\/p>\n<h2>What Are Gambling Industry Levies and Why Do They Matter?<\/h2>\n<p>Required monetary contributions from gambling operators constitute a structured approach to addressing the social consequences of gaming activities through dedicated funding mechanisms. These contributions are established through compliance structures that require authorized gaming companies to set aside a portion of their revenue toward community wellness initiatives, specifically targeting gambling addiction treatment and prevention services.<\/p>\n<p>The primary justification behind these monetary commitments stems from the acknowledgment that casino businesses generate both financial gains and possible community damage within societies. By mandating that businesses to provide funding, jurisdictions establish a ongoing support system that directly links the industry&#8217;s profitability with its obligation to reduce harmful effects on vulnerable populations.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Income-based assessments tied to total gaming revenue<\/li>\n<li>Annual fixed permit fees for operational permits<\/li>\n<li>Tiered contribution frameworks based on operator scale<\/li>\n<li>Specific allocations for research and education initiatives<\/li>\n<li>Fines for non-compliance with payment schedules<\/li>\n<li>Clear disclosure requirements for fund usage<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These established funding mechanisms guarantee consistent funding flow regardless of economic fluctuations, establishing stability for recovery initiatives and community resources. The reliable income flow enables extended strategic development for treatment facilities, therapeutic support, and community outreach initiatives intended to assist individuals affected by gambling-related problems.<\/p>\n<h2>How Casino Taxes Are Determined and Gathered<\/h2>\n<p>Jurisdictions globally employ diverse methodologies to assess and obtain financial contributions from gambling operators, with each approach created to equilibrate revenue generation against administrative feasibility. The chosen calculation method significantly influences the capital allocated for support services and the regulatory obligations placed on operators. Regulatory authorities must consider factors including market scale, operator profitability, and the frequency of gambling-associated problems when establishing these financial frameworks.<\/p>\n<p>Funding collection approaches differ significantly across regions, extending from automated revenue-based assessments to periodic licensing structures that incorporate problem gambling funding components. Many jurisdictions mandate that operators to submit detailed financial reports that serve as the basis for levy calculations, while others implement standardized fee schedules founded on license categories or size of operations. The effectiveness of these collection systems depends heavily on comprehensive regulatory oversight and transparent reporting requirements.<\/p>\n<h3>Percentage-Based Tax Structures<\/h3>\n<p>Levies based on revenue represent the most common approach, generally determining contributions as a fixed percentage of gross gaming revenue or net profits generated by gaming operations. This model ensures that funding scales proportionally with sector expansion, creating a stable funding source that increases with gambling activity. Rates typically fall from 0.1% to 2% of total gaming revenue, though jurisdictions may apply different percentages to various gambling sectors such as gaming venues, lotteries, or digital platforms.<\/p>\n<p>The key advantage of percentage-based models lies in their built-in fairness, as larger operators contributing more to gambling-related harm naturally provide increased funding for treatment programs. However, these models require sophisticated financial monitoring systems to confirm reported revenues and avoid underreporting. Jurisdictions implementing this approach must establish clear definitions of assessable revenue, accounting for promotional credits, player winnings, and operating costs to ensure consistent application across all operators.<\/p>\n<h3>Fixed Fee Evaluation Models<\/h3>\n<p>Fixed-fee models impose predetermined annual or licensing-period charges on gambling operators, independent of their revenue performance or operational scale. These structures provide administrative simplicity and predictable funding streams for treatment programs, removing the need for continuous financial verification and detailed audit procedures. Fixed charges may be tiered based on license categories, with varying fees assigned to casinos, gaming establishments, online operators, and slot machine suppliers.<\/p>\n<p>While flat fee systems minimize administrative overhead and compliance costs, they may place undue strain on smaller operators while allowing major casino operators to contribute less relative to their market impact. Some jurisdictions tackle this challenge by combining flat fees with floor contribution levels or additional revenue-sharing mechanisms. The consistency of fixed fee models benefits both regulators planning treatment program budgets and operators managing their financial obligations throughout licensing periods.<\/p>\n<h3>Integrated Collection Approaches<\/h3>\n<p>Increasingly, regulatory authorities adopt hybrid models that combine aspects of both percentage-based and flat fee systems to ensure stable funding while keeping contributions proportional. These approaches might levy a base licensing fee combined with revenue-based assessments once providers reach defined revenue limits. Mixed frameworks allow regulatory bodies to guarantee minimum funding levels for support initiatives while guaranteeing that major revenue-generating operators contribute commensurate with their market presence.<\/p>\n<p>Hybrid frameworks deliver flexibility to accommodate diverse gambling sectors operating under unified regulatory oversight, applying different calculation methods to land-based versus online operations or distinguishing between high-volume and boutique gambling establishments. This adaptability proves particularly valuable in rapidly evolving gambling markets where new technologies and business models emerge regularly. By incorporating multiple assessment mechanisms, jurisdictions can refine their funding formulas based on empirical data regarding problem gambling prevalence and treatment program costs.<\/p>\n<h2>Allocation of Levy Funds to Recovery Services<\/h2>\n<p>Once gathered from gaming operators, levy funds typically flow through state or provincial oversight bodies that function as primary coordinators for problem gambling initiatives. These agencies create funding programs, issue requests for proposals, and distribute funding based on demonstrated community needs, population demographics, and service gaps identified through research studies. Funding approaches differ considerably across jurisdictions, with some regions supporting direct grants to state-run treatment facilities while others promote competitive funding models that enable nonprofit organizations and private treatment providers to access available resources.<\/p>\n<p>The distribution framework typically prioritizes evidence-based treatment modalities including cognitive behavioral therapy, motivational interviewing, and family counseling services that have demonstrated effectiveness in treating problematic gambling patterns. Grant recipients must typically meet stringent accountability standards, including consistent documentation on treatment results, service utilization rates, and adherence to clinical best practices. Many jurisdictions also allocate segments of collected funds to prevention programs focused on young people, community education efforts, and training initiatives for healthcare professionals who may encounter problem gamblers in clinical settings.<\/p>\n<p>Transparency in fund distribution remains a critical concern for stakeholders tracking how collected revenues translate into available care programs. Most governing authorities publish annual reports detailing total revenue figures, operational expenses, and breakdowns of how funds support various program categories including support hotlines, inpatient care centers, community-based therapy, and scientific studies. This accountability framework helps ensure that required industry payments effectively address the public health consequences of casino growth while preserving community trust in the governing body&#8217;s commitment to harm minimization.<\/p>\n<h2>Instances of Levy Funded Initiatives by Area<\/h2>\n<p>Across different regions worldwide, required gaming operator funding have established diverse treatment and prevention initiatives designed for local needs and compliance requirements. These programs demonstrate how dedicated funding streams result in concrete assistance programs for impacted people and their communities.<\/p>\n<p>Regional distinctions in program design showcase cultural contexts, population demographics, and the maturity of gambling markets. Reviewing concrete instances illustrates the practical implementation of collected funds and their effect on public health outcomes.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Region\/Jurisdiction<\/th>\n<th>Annual Funding Amount<\/th>\n<th>Primary Programs Funded<\/th>\n<th>Population Served<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>United Kingdom<\/td>\n<td>\u00a3110 million<\/td>\n<td>National Gaming Treatment Service, GamCare support line, research programs<\/td>\n<td>67 million residents<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ontario, Canada<\/td>\n<td>CAD $40 million<\/td>\n<td>Problem Gambling Helpline, residential treatment facilities, youth prevention<\/td>\n<td>15 million people<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Victoria, Australia<\/td>\n<td>AUD $70 million<\/td>\n<td>Gaming Help services, community education, venue support programs<\/td>\n<td>6.7 million people<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>New Jersey, USA<\/td>\n<td>USD $15 million<\/td>\n<td>Council on Compulsive Gambling hotline, outpatient therapy, training initiatives<\/td>\n<td>9.3 million residents<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sweden<\/td>\n<td>SEK 150 million<\/td>\n<td>St\u00f6dlinjen national support line, treatment support, prevention initiatives<\/td>\n<td>10.5 million residents<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>These jurisdictions illustrate extensive frameworks where tax proceeds fund diverse programs including helplines, counseling services, inpatient rehabilitation centers, and awareness initiatives addressing vulnerable populations.<\/p>\n<p>The success of these initiatives is contingent on both funding levels but also on management systems, data-informed methods, and regular monitoring systems that guarantee support gets to those requiring the greatest support and intervention.<\/p>\n<h2>Challenges and Controversies Related to Gambling Levies<\/h2>\n<p>The administration and oversight of mandatory operator fees encounter significant obstacles including variable collection procedures, jurisdictional disputes over fund allocation, and discussions regarding suitable fee levels that reconcile industry sustainability with sufficient treatment resources.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Operators argue fees create market disadvantages<\/li>\n<li>Lacking clarity in revenue distribution processes<\/li>\n<li>Debate over ideal portion of gaming revenues<\/li>\n<li>Enforcement difficulties in digital gaming platforms<\/li>\n<li>Concerns about efficacy of funded programs<\/li>\n<li>Conflicts between participant funding priorities<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These disputes underscore the intricate tension between generating sufficient resources for problem gambling services while maintaining a viable regulatory framework that does not push providers toward unregulated markets or offshore locations.<\/p>\n<h2>The Emerging landscape of Gambling Industry Levies and Responsible gaming Support<\/h2>\n<p>The terrain of funding for problematic gambling treatment continues to evolve as technological advancements and regulatory changes redefine the gaming industry. Digital platforms now produce significant revenue streams, prompting jurisdictions to re-examine conventional tax structures to provide adequate funding for treatment services. Officials more and more recognize that long-term support systems necessitate flexible approaches that consider evolving gaming formats and international operations.<\/p>\n<p>Emerging patterns suggest a shift toward greater transparency in allocation mechanisms, with stakeholders demanding greater accountability in how collected funds translate into tangible treatment outcomes. Evidence-based approaches are gaining prominence, encouraging jurisdictions to measure program effectiveness and adjust funding priorities accordingly. Collaborative initiatives between regulators, operators, and health professionals are establishing best practices that enhance the effectiveness of available resources while tackling shortfalls in service delivery.<\/p>\n<p>Looking ahead, the success of problem gaming support will depend on maintaining robust funding mechanisms that can accommodate industry growth and evolving player preferences. International cooperation and knowledge sharing among jurisdictions will grow more critical as gambling markets globalize. By guaranteeing financial contributions remain proportionate to market expansion and are directed efficiently toward harm prevention and recovery services, the system can more effectively safeguard vulnerable individuals while promoting sustainable gaming practices.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The financing of gambling addiction treatment programs depends significantly on financial contributions generated through gambling sites not on GamStop imposed on operators across different regions. These mandatory fees, typically calculated as a portion of gaming earnings or as fixed licensing costs, create a designated funding source specifically allocated to prevention, education, and treatment services for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[673],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Grasping How the Gaming Sector Levies Support Problematic Gambling Recovery Initiatives - C\u00f4ng ty TNHH LABOCHEM Vi\u1ec7t Nam<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Grasping How the Gaming Sector Levies Support Problematic Gambling Recovery Initiatives - C\u00f4ng ty TNHH LABOCHEM Vi\u1ec7t Nam\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The financing of gambling addiction treatment programs depends significantly on financial contributions generated through gambling sites not on GamStop imposed on operators across different regions. These mandatory fees, typically calculated as a portion of gaming earnings or as fixed licensing costs, create a designated funding source specifically allocated to prevention, education, and treatment services for [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"C\u00f4ng ty TNHH LABOCHEM Vi\u1ec7t Nam\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-17T00:27:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"\u0110\u00e0o L\u00ea D\u0169ng\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\u0110\u00e0o L\u00ea D\u0169ng\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/\",\"name\":\"Grasping How the Gaming Sector Levies Support Problematic Gambling Recovery Initiatives - C\u00f4ng ty TNHH LABOCHEM Vi\u1ec7t Nam\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-17T00:27:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-17T00:27:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/#\/schema\/person\/b0e28dc0faa662cd2d61b792ad95bc5c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Grasping How the Gaming Sector Levies Support Problematic Gambling Recovery Initiatives\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/\",\"name\":\"C\u00f4ng ty TNHH LABOCHEM Vi\u1ec7t Nam\",\"description\":\"M\u1ed9t trang web m\u1edbi s\u1eed d\u1ee5ng WordPress\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/#\/schema\/person\/b0e28dc0faa662cd2d61b792ad95bc5c\",\"name\":\"\u0110\u00e0o L\u00ea D\u0169ng\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e944c8b3ef107790ca3422ef4b85b9d4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e944c8b3ef107790ca3422ef4b85b9d4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"\u0110\u00e0o L\u00ea D\u0169ng\"},\"url\":\"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/author\/labochem\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Grasping How the Gaming Sector Levies Support Problematic Gambling Recovery Initiatives - C\u00f4ng ty TNHH LABOCHEM Vi\u1ec7t Nam","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Grasping How the Gaming Sector Levies Support Problematic Gambling Recovery Initiatives - C\u00f4ng ty TNHH LABOCHEM Vi\u1ec7t Nam","og_description":"The financing of gambling addiction treatment programs depends significantly on financial contributions generated through gambling sites not on GamStop imposed on operators across different regions. These mandatory fees, typically calculated as a portion of gaming earnings or as fixed licensing costs, create a designated funding source specifically allocated to prevention, education, and treatment services for [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/","og_site_name":"C\u00f4ng ty TNHH LABOCHEM Vi\u1ec7t Nam","article_published_time":"2026-10-17T00:27:19+00:00","author":"\u0110\u00e0o L\u00ea D\u0169ng","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"\u0110\u00e0o L\u00ea D\u0169ng","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/","url":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/","name":"Grasping How the Gaming Sector Levies Support Problematic Gambling Recovery Initiatives - C\u00f4ng ty TNHH LABOCHEM Vi\u1ec7t Nam","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-10-17T00:27:19+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-17T00:27:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/#\/schema\/person\/b0e28dc0faa662cd2d61b792ad95bc5c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/2026\/10\/17\/grasping-how-the-gaming-sector-levies-support-problematic-gambling-recovery-initiatives\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Grasping How the Gaming Sector Levies Support Problematic Gambling Recovery Initiatives"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/#website","url":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/","name":"C\u00f4ng ty TNHH LABOCHEM Vi\u1ec7t Nam","description":"M\u1ed9t trang web m\u1edbi s\u1eed d\u1ee5ng WordPress","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/#\/schema\/person\/b0e28dc0faa662cd2d61b792ad95bc5c","name":"\u0110\u00e0o L\u00ea D\u0169ng","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e944c8b3ef107790ca3422ef4b85b9d4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e944c8b3ef107790ca3422ef4b85b9d4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"\u0110\u00e0o L\u00ea D\u0169ng"},"url":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/author\/labochem\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13636"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13636"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13636\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/labochem.com.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}